Charity Funding Does Not Justify the Local Risk
While casinos generate revenue for operators and some charities, host towns receive none of that money directly. Littleton would shoulder the impacts while outside interests collect most of the financial rewards. Besides, NH charities get a percentage of the taxes and not a cut of casino revenues resulting in only about 10% (and millions less) donated to charities and NOT the 35% of revenue so many seem to think.
Littleton Is a Small Town, Not a Casino Market
With roughly 6,000 residents, Littleton does not have the infrastructure, staffing, or municipal scale of cities like Nashua. What might be manageable for a large city can overwhelm a small North Country town.
Casinos Create Costs That Littleton Would Have to Pay—Not the Operator
New Hampshire casinos currently provide nothing to host towns beyond property taxes. Increased demands on police, fire, EMS, roads, and social services would fall squarely on Littleton taxpayers. Casinos use tax dollars that taxpayers pay!!!
Increased Police and Emergency Calls Are Likely—and Expensive
Studies cited in the article show crime increases beginning about five years after casinos open, including spikes in theft, assault, and robbery. Even a modest increase in calls can strain Littleton’s limited police force and budget.
Problem Gambling Hits Rural Communities Harder
Research shows gambling addiction increases with proximity to casinos. In a rural region with fewer social services and treatment options, the human and economic costs of addiction can be especially damaging.
Once Casinos Are In, They Are Extremely Hard to Undo
As several legislators noted, casinos are not like other businesses. Once established, expansion pressure follows—more machines, longer hours, more alcohol, and more political influence. Opting out now avoids locking Littleton into long-term consequences it may later regret.
Opting Out Is Not Anti-Business—It’s Pro–Local Control
Even casino supporters in the Legislature acknowledge that communities deserve a real say. Voting to opt out sends a clear message: Littleton values deliberate growth, fiscal responsibility, and community character over rushed expansion driven by state policy gaps.